Rahasia Di Balik Uang Dollar Amerika

on 11 September 2010
Pada postingan kali ini saya akan sedikit menjelaskan tentang konspirasi (atau lebih tepatnya pesan terselubung) yang terdapat pada mata uang Amerika Serikat. Data ini dibuat dengan sebenar-benarnya dan dengan fakta kenyataan yang terjadi di dunia ini.

Sekarang kita kembali ke tragedi 911 (September 11) dimana gedung kembar WTC di New York runtuh ditabrak oleh dua buah pesawat, dan markas pertahanan keamanan militer Amerika, Pentagon juga rusak ditabrak pesawat. Tapi benarkah begitu? Begitu mudahnya bangunan-bangunan kokoh berkonstruksi baja itu dapat tumbang? Memang ada perhitungan teori fisika yang membuat hal itu mustahil terjadi. Tapi saya tidak akan menjelaskan hal itu saat ini. Sekarang kita bahas saja hal yang lebih tidak masuk akal daripada itu.
Amerika Serikat berdiri kurang lebih 450 tahun yang lalu. Dimana saat itu ditetapkannya pula mata uang Amerika Serikat yang berwarna hijau itu. Dan sejak 450 tahun yang lalu pula mata uang Amerika tidak pernah direvisi.

Sekarang coba kita telaah mata uang yang sejak 450 tahun yang lalu itu belum berubah bentuknya.
Dimulai dari uang 20 Dolar.


Ini uang 20 Dolar Amerika.
Sekarang kita coba lipat. (Ingat bahwa mata uang ini belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu)


(Kalau ada yang membawa uang 20 Dolar Amerika, boleh dicoba.)Sekarang kita coba lipat lagi. (Sekali lagi saya ingatkan bahwa mata uang ini belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu.)

Sekarang kita lipat lagi seperti ini. (Kita bukan sedang belajar membuat origami ya!)
Kalau sudah…sekarang lipat lagi seperti dibawah ini, dan lihat hasilnya..maksudnya lihat gambar yang dilingkari ini.

Nah loh! Apakah itu??
Itu adalah gambar Pentagon setelah ditabrak pesawat. Lihat gambar gedung yang berasap itu!Kalau masih belum percaya, akan saya perjelas lagi.



Nah! Sama kan??
Untuk kali ini terbukti bahwa uang 20 Dolar Amerika menyimpan rahasia tentang konspirasi
penghancuran Pentagon. (oleh siapa? Mata uang ini kan punya Amerika sendiri??)
(Sekali lagi saya ingatkan bahwa mata uang ini belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu)
Cukup untuk pesan terselubung Pentagonnya. Sekarang kita ke New York dengan 20 Dolar yang
setengah kusut ini, untuk melihat ada apa di sana.
Masih di 20 Dolar Amerika yang belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu.
Sekarang kita pakai sisi lain dari uang 20 Dolar ini.
Langsung saja lipat seperti gambar di bawah ya! (Ikuti instruksi!)


Langsung saja kita lihat hasil karya lipatan kita…Nah loh! Kok begini???


Sepertinya saya kenal gedung itu!
Ya, benar sekali…itu adalah gedung kembar WTC New York yang sekarang tinggal kenangan itu.
Masih belum percaya?? Lihat ini!

(Ingat bahwa mata uang ini belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu)
Bagian sebelah kiri ditabrak oleh Flight 175 dari United Airlines yang meluncur dari sebelah kanan
gedung. Sementara bagian sebelah kanan ditabrak oleh Flight 11 yang dimiliki American Airlines
yang meluncur dari sebelah kiri. Lihat tulisan di kanan dan di kiri uang, yang lengkapnya adalah
The United State of America. (Lho? Memangnya 450 tahun yang lalu kedua perusahaan
penerbangan itu sudah ada? Jawabannya, tentu saja belum. Bahkan ke 2 gedung itu -pentagon
dan WTC- bahkan belum dibangun.)
Sekarang kita bahas bagian yang paling aneh dari 20 Dolar kita ini.
Lihat baik-baik gambar ini!


Nah loh! Sudahkan 450 tahun yang lalu OSAMA BIN LADEN lahir??
(Jangankan OSAMA, Buyutnya Kakek Buyutnya saja belum lahir.)
Untuk rahasia dibalik 20 Dolar ini, bisa ditemukannya dari kode :
911 (September 11) >> 9 + 11 = 20
Jadinya 20 Dolar!
Cukup untuk 20 Dolar, karena sudah kusut kita lipat-lipat sekarang kita tukarkan uangnya dengan
sebuah 5 Dolar dan sebuah 10 Dolar. Lihat ini!

 
Dalam 5 Dolar Amerika yang belum pernah dirubah sejak 450 tahun yang lalu juga terdapat
rahasia penghancuran WTC New York.
Sekarang kita lihat uang 10 Dolar kita!


Gedung pertama WTC yang sudah berasap.
Belum puas?? Lagi??
Sekarang kita pinjam uang 50 Dolar dari tetangga saya.


Ini WTC saat bangunannya runtuh.
Mau lagi?? Kita pinjam lagi 100 Dolar sama tetangga saya yang tadi.


Lho?? Apa ini??
Ini asap gambar asap dari WTC yang telah runtuh.
Detail sekali mereka membuat pesan terselubung ini!
Sampai-sampai gambar asapnya saja tidak lupa dibuat.
Sudah cukup melipat-lipatnya, kalau terlalu kusut nilai dolar yang kita punya jatuh.
Tahukah kamu siapa yang membuat pesan terselubung ini???
Jawabannya ada di uang 1 Dolar! (Lagi-lagi uang!)
Lihat ini!!


Coba lihat 2 lambang yang ada di dalam 2 lingkaran itu!!

Nah loh!!! Ini lambang ILLUMINATI, yaitu organisasi super rahasia milik YAHUDI.
Lihat lambang MATA HORUS dan TULISAN “NOVUS ORDO SECLOHUM” yang artinya “NEW
WORLD ORDER” atau “TATA DUNIA BARU”
Nah loh!! Mau di jadikan apa kita sama orang-orang ZIONIS Yahudi itu??
Terus lihat yang ini!! Lambang bintang-bintang yang ada di atas kepala burung itu!


Bintang-bintang itu membentuk suatu lambang, yaitu lambang “DAVID STAR” lambang kebanggaan YAHUDI.
Oh iya, untuk diketahui nomor pesawat Flight 11 yang menabrak WTC adalah :
Q33NY
Coba di copy paste nomor ini ke OFFICE WORD dan diblok lalu ubah font-nya ke wingdings.
Nanti hasilnya seperti ini…


Artinya: PESAWAT >> MENABRAK 2 GEDUNG >> KORBAN BERJATUHAN >>> DAN PELAKUNYA ADALAH


                      Anda tahu, lambang apakah ini???   

Conflicting views the norm

on 8 September 2010
The apparent belligerence of Indonesia’s media in the recent spat over the alleged ‘encroachment’ in the Malacca Straits, has more to do with the culture of open and robust debate than actual hostility.

INDONESIAN TV news is not for the faint-hearted. Having spent a few hours last week in various studios, I can assure you that moments of extreme panic are interspersed by a sense of ridiculousness.

Last week, for example, as I struggled to explain on Metro TV “transgressions of sovereignty” in Bahasa Indonesia, the very nice gentlemen next to me sounded an impassioned call for war with Malaysia.

Needless to say, as someone who has argued for stronger Malaysia-Indonesia ties, the latest diplomatic spat has been dismaying.

It began when three Indonesian fisheries officers were detained by Malaysian police in August.

Initially, I had expected the matter to be settled amicably.

However, the timing was very unfortunate, coming just days before Indonesia’s Independence Day celebrations on Aug 17. Understandably perhaps, the republic’s media went into overdrive and the issue quickly gained momentum.
Public anger: Indonesians protesting in front of the Malaysian embassy in Jakarta on Aug 26. — AFP

In the ensuing controversy, some Indonesians became increasingly incensed at what was seen as a series of deliberate slights.

The first was the perceived “barter” transaction, that the Indonesian officers had been released in exchange for seven Malaysian fishermen who were detained earlier. Subsequently, it was further alleged that the detained Indonesian officials had been ill-treated.

In the following weeks, some Malaysian politicians unfortunately chose to adopt an aggressive tone (calling for the issuance of a travel advisory) just as President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono seemed to step back from taking stern action.

Conversely, Malaysians were upset by the extremely provocative demonstrations outside our embassy in Jakarta, not to mention the apparent belligerence of Indonesia’s media.

Amid this highly volatile environment, I was invited to appear on a number of Indonesian TV talk shows.

In the past, I’ve tended to avoid getting involved in bilateral relations. I am not paid to intervene. I am neither a diplomat nor a politician. However, this time around, because of the total absence of Malaysian views in Jakarta, I felt I had to step into the debate and present a human face to who and what we are.

At the same time, friends in Jakarta-based media were desperately looking for a Malaysian (any Malaysian) who could provide an alternative perspective.

I have to confess that the experience was as challenging as it was enjoyable. It also revealed to me – yet again – the vastly different nature of political debate in our two countries. Moreover, this represents a fundamental challenge for our two countries as we move ahead.

Let me explain: in Indonesia there is public debate. It is open and it is robust. People are unafraid of criticising the president directly. In Malaysia, the mainstream media, in serving our leaders, often fail to protect and/or educate the public.

However, the Indonesian media is very diverse and multi-faceted. Indeed, there are marked differences between how Jakarta-based journalists think and react and those in the provinces.

Whatever the case, it is also an intensely competitive, individualistic environment. In short: You generalise at your peril.

For example: Metro TV’s Najwa Shihab was delightful and extremely gracious; Global TV’s Rosi Silalahi was razor-sharp and uncompromising. Meanwhile TVone’s Tina Talisa was indefatigable, button-holing Asean secretary-general Surin Pitsuwan as he happened to walk by during our interview set-up.

So what did I learn? Well, for starters, TV, especially live TV, is about human emotions. Yes, you must be clear in what you say, but the way you say it and the reactions from your fellow guests as well as the all-important interviewer are critical.

Second, you have to remain calm, however provocative or heated the discussion might get. Equanimity is critical.

Third, when you are in someone else’s country you have to pick your words very carefully; all the more so since you’ve still got to return to Kuala Lumpur at some stage where there’s less tolerance for critical views in the media.

Which brings me to the last point, namely, that the vastly different political cultures of our two countries will make a swift resolution of outstanding bilateral issues difficult if not impossible.

In Indonesia, the media mirrors the nation’s complexity. Conflicting views are the norm. TV anchors delight in baiting ministers and the powerful. Indeed, President Susilo has been very much under attack for his perceived softness in the face of Malaysian “arrogance”.

By way of comparison, in Malaysia, control and regimentation mean we often forgo our diversity in the quest for discipline.

Finally, it’s clear that while there is general unhappiness in Jakarta with Malaysia, the hostility of groups like Bendera, is more than matched by the general good sense of the Indonesian public.

Indeed, there were many sober voices in the various studios ranging from the straight-talking, former diplomat Hashim Djalal (father of presidential spokesman Dino Patti Djalal) and the Jakarta Post’s supremely eloquent editor, Mediyatama Suryodiningrat (better known as Pak Dymas).

Let’s hope that cooler heads will continue to prevail.

Indonesia-Malaysia dispute, history repeated

on 1 September 2010
Nationalist leaders in Medan, Ramlan Rangkuti, said the feud between Indonesia and Malaysia, is a history that repeats, like a year from 1962 to 1966.

"That time, these two countries at odds to embed its dominance for the future of the island of Borneo," she called to alert Online, mini mala.

Ramlan explained, the historical confrontation between Indonesia and Malaysia began from a desire to combine the neighbor country of Brunei, Sabah and Sarawak Tanah Melayu by the Guild in 1961. But desire is opposed by President Sukarno, who consider Malaysia as "puppets" of Britain. In 1961, Borneo was divided into four administrative.

"Kalimantan, an Indonesian province, located in south Kalimantan. In the north were the kingdom of Brunei and two British colonies, Sarawak and British North Borneo, later renamed Sabah, "he said.

As part of its withdrawal from its colonies in Southeast Asia, added Ramlan, the UK moved to combine its colonies on Borneo with Malaya to form Malaysia.

"The plan was opposed by the Indonesian government, was then president Sukarno argued that Malaysia was a British puppet, and the consolidation of Malaysia would increase British control in the region, thus threatening the independence of Indonesia," he explained.

At that time, continued Ramlan, in Brunei, North Borneo National Army (TNKU) began a rebellion on December 8, 1962. They try